On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this work.
First party to hold a convention to nominate candidates Prohibition Party Has nominated a candidate for president in every election since Progressive Party Elected a number of candidates to state legislatures, Congress, and even the U.
Green Party Some members have won local elections. People who feel strongly about a particular issue might be drawn to a third party that focuses exclusively on that issue. The Greenback Party focused on the monetary system, and the Prohibition Party sought to ban the consumption of alcohol.
The Populist Party, meanwhile, grew out of the Populist movement, and the Republican Party developed primarily out of the abolitionist movement. Dissatisfaction with the status quo: Some third parties form when part of a major party breaks off in protest and forms a splinter party.
InTheodore Roosevelt led a group of dissidents out of the Republican Party to form the splinter Progressive Party. Third parties can be closely tied to a specific region, which can increase their appeal.
If the leader leaves the party, however, the party often collapses, which is what happened to the Reform Party in the mids. Inthe party split in two over the candidacy of former Republican Pat Buchanan.
Neither Buchanan nor his Reform Party rival gained many votes, and the party has largely disappeared from the national stage.
The Role of Third Parties Despite their lack of success in the polls, third parties can affect American politics in a number of ways: Third parties propose many government policies and practices. The Populist Party introduced ideas that influenced some economic policies of the New Deal, whereas the Anti-Masonic Party was the first party to use a convention to nominate its candidates, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Put issues on the agenda: Third parties can force the major parties to address potentially divisive problems. Inneither Bill Clinton nor George H.
Bush talked much about the budget deficit until independent candidate Ross Perot emphasized it in his campaign. Third parties can cost one party an election by playing the spoiler.
If a third party draws enough votes away from a major party, it can prevent that party from winning. It is impossible to know for sure what would have happened had the third-party candidate not run, but in some cases, it seems that the third party probably cost one candidate the election.
Keep the major parties honest: A leftist party can challenge the Democratic Party, for example, on social justice issues, whereas a conservative party can pose problems for the Republican Party. Because third-party candidates usually have little chance of winning, they can speak more frankly than their major party rivals, addressing facts and issues that the major parties would often prefer to ignore.Essay The Effect of Third Party Candidates in Presidental Elections Although citizens of the United States have the opportunity to vote for many different offices at the national, state, and local levels, the election of the president of the United States every four years is .
Each election year, people have increasingly said they would consider an independent or third party candidate. But that support shrinks when they enter the voting booth: in , 40% of people polled said they would consider voting for a third-party candidate, but .
An effect of third-party candidates, such as Theodore Roosevelt, on presidential elections is they change outcomes of elections.
This had became the issue because of the change of the outcome of the elections and made a controversy througout the country. Mar 10, · Another possible Republican presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, made similar comments last month.
Fact Check: How much of an impact do third-party candidates have in general elections? - No third-party candidate has ever won a U.S. presidential election. The Effect of Third Party Candidates in Presidental Elections Although citizens of the United States have the opportunity to vote for many different offices at .
Probably the most disliked effect that strong third-party candidates could have on US presidential elections would be if such a candidate diverted enough votes from the major-party candidates to.